It is worth knowing and committed to authors, reviewers, panelists and editor-in-chief of all ethics in research and related responsibilities in this field. Therefore, if a person fails to adhere to these principles and responsibilities, the publication can take the necessary legal action. Obviously, the publication of the article does not mean verification of the contents by the magazine.

Author's Duties and Responsibilities:

  • Only articles accepted in the specialized field of the quarterly journal should be prepared scientifically and coherently.
  • The paper presented to the journal is based on one of a variety of articles, with careful research, the proper reporting of data, and the mention of resources contained in the research of other people and the author / authors are responsible for the accuracy and accuracy of the content of their articles.
    (Duplicate Submission) An article is not acceptable in several publications. In other words, the article or part of it has not been published in any other journal in the course of the proceedings.
  • Avoiding Overlapping Publication in the sense that the publication of the data and findings of previous articles is slightly changed in a new article.
  • If necessary to use the content of others, they should be carefully referenced and, if necessary, must be given the necessary resources after obtaining written and explicit permission. When other writings of another researcher are used, the methods and symbols of direct quotation, such as inserting it into the quilts, should be used.
  • Author of the article is responsible for the existence of the names and information of all the authors (after obtaining approval from the named persons) and the absence of a name other than those involved in the research and the preparation of the paper.
    Do not insert the Gift Authorship and delete the original author (Ghost Authorship).
  • The author of the article is responsible for ensuring that all authors of the article study it and agree to its presentation and position in the paper.
    In case of any errors and uncertainty in the article, the author / writers should immediately send the original to the publication.
  • The writer is required to maintain the samples and raw information used in the preparation of the article, even after publication, in order to answer the critics and questions posed by the readers of the publication.

Research and Publication Misconduct

If in any of the stages of submission, review, editing, or publication of the article in or after publication, the occurrence of one of the following is considered to be unethical behavior of publishing and research, and the publication has the right to clash with it.

  • Fabrication: It is the presentation of unrealistic material and the presentation of data or fictitious results as laboratory results, empirical studies, and personal findings. Incorrect filing of what has not happened or shifting the results of various studies are examples of this violation.
  • Falsification: Data distortion involves manipulating materials, tools, and research processes, or modifying or deleting data so that the results of the research are different from actual results.
  • Plagiarism: Theft is referred to as unintentional, knowingly or obscure words, ideas, phrases, claims, or citations of others without appreciation and explanation and appropriate citation to the work, the owner of the work or the speaker of the idea.
  • Scientific rent: It means that the writer should employ another person to do research and, after the end of the research, publish it under his own name.
  • Unrealistic assignment: The author / writer's unrealistic assignment of an author / writer to an institution, center or educational or research group that has not played a role in the original research.

Reviewers Responsibility

  • Qualitative, content and scientific review of articles in order to improve, enhance the quality and content of articles.
    Informing the editor of the publication of the acceptance or refusal of the arbitration (in relation to the non-relevance of the subject area of ​​the article to the referee's specialty) and the introduction of an alternate judge upon adjudication.
  • The necessity of not accepting articles that are intended to benefit the individuals, institutions and corporations by which they are derived or personal relationships, as well as articles contributed to, analyzed or written.
  • The review of the articles should be based on scientific evidence and sufficient reasoning and refraining from arbitrary, personal, trade, racial, religious, etc. arbitration.
  • Precise evaluation of the article and the statement of the strengths and weaknesses of the article in a constructive, explicit and educational manner.
    Responsibility, Accountability, Timeliness, Interests and Adherence to Professional Ethics and Respect for the Rights of Others.
  • Do not modify and rewrite the article based on personal taste.
    Ensure that the article is fully referenced to all research, topics and quotes that are used in the article, as well as to remind non-referenced items in related published research.
  • Avoid revising information and details in articles for others.
    It is not appropriate for the referee to use the data or new concepts before or after the publication of the article in favor of or against their own research or others, or to criticize or invalidate the authors. Also, after publishing the article, the referee does not have the right to publish details beyond what was published by the magazine.
  • It is not appropriate for the referee to disclose an article to another person, including his college or postgraduate students, except with the permission of the editor of the magazine. The name of anyone who contributed to the review of the article should be mentioned in the arbitration report to the editor and be recorded in the journal's documents.
  • The referee does not allow direct contact with the authors regarding the articles being pending. Any contact with the authors of the articles will only be done through the magazine office.
  • An attempt to present a report on the behavioral and editorial conduct of publications and the submission of relevant documents to the editor of the publication.

Specialty Editors


  • The specialty secretary has the task of communicating with researchers and researchers even outside the headquarters.
  • The greater the profile of the secretary of the group in its field of work and expertise, it will be possible to attract more powerful forces and researchers.
  • These secretaries usually have a high degree of analytical power and are completely surrounded by intelligence and analyzes in their area of ​​work, and thus, they are always able to choose the sources of intellectual power for researchers.


  • Specialty teachers are managers who are on the one hand with the authors and on the other hand with the director and editor.
    On the one hand, they are aware of the policies and goals of the publication, and on the other hand, they will work with writers with specialist functions and decisions, with elegance, artistic and professional ability and management.
  • The specialty secretary has the task of communicating with researchers and researchers even outside the headquarters.
  • In selecting qualified judges, they will focus on the field of expertise, excellence, scientific and work experience, and moral commitment.
    The editor receives deep and accepted judgments, avoids superficial judgments, and treats arbitrary, unfounded, or humiliating verdicts.
  • It is necessary to take the necessary steps to register and archive the documents for reviewing the papers as scientific documents, and to keep the names of the judges secret.
  • The prompt announcement of the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article is the responsibility of the author.
  • Consider all information contained in the articles as confidential and avoid sharing and discussing details with others.
  • Conflict of interests in the process of arbitration, in view of any personal, commercial, academic or financial, which may potentially affect the acceptance and publication of the articles presented.
  • Excerpts from the publications and research ethics that are reported by the judges or in any other way are carefully reviewed and, if necessary, taken.
    Rather than the prompt removal of published articles that reveal that there has been an unethical behavior in publishing and research, and provide transparent information to readers and relevant indexing agencies.
  • To review and promptly make corrections and provide clear information to readers for published articles in which errors have been found.
    Supervision on the affairs of the editor and editorial staff and a separate report on each of them.
  • Review the goals of the publication and evaluate the extent of its realization after a period in the form of a report to the owners of the points
    Proposals of legal centers and people at a higher level to play a role as the publisher's privilege

Owners or members of the forum (Publisher and owner)

  • Investigate the increase or decrease in the participation of legal and legal members at this managerial level
  • Selection of the chairman by obtaining a majority of votes and notifying the relevant ministry
  • Introduction of the responsible director and general changes to the relevant ministry